Marijuana legalization

expected to go to ballot in California

Opponents of a plan to legalize marijuana for personal possession in California have conceded that supporters of the measure are likely to get their proposal on a statewide ballot, the New York Times revealed in a longer story about possible legalization Wednesday.

California lawmakers are taking up a bill that would legalize, tax and regulate marijuana, a first in the United States. Officials estimate the bill could bring in an additional $1.4 billion a year, a huge sum of money in a state bedeviled by financial woes.

While the “legislature is uncertain, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, has indicated he would be open to a “robust debate” on the issue,” the Times wrote.

Perhaps equally important, the paper adds:

California voters are also taking up legalization. Three separate initiatives are being circulated for signatures to appear on the ballot next year, all of which would permit adults to possess marijuana for personal use and allow local governments to tax it. Even opponents of legalization suggest that an initiative is likely to qualify for a statewide vote.

All of us in the movement have had the feeling that we’ve been running into the wind for years,” said James P. Gray, a retired judge in Orange County who has been outspoken in support of legalization. “Now we sense we are running with the wind.”Proponents of the leading ballot initiative have collected nearly 300,000 signatures since late September, supporters say, easily on pace to qualify for the November 2010 general election. Richard Lee, a longtime marijuana activist who is behind the measure, says he has raised nearly $1 million to hire professionals to assist volunteers in gathering the signatures.

“Voters are ripping the petitions out of our hands,” Mr. Lee said.

Despite widespread support, however, the bill would almost certainly run into thorns with federal law, which classifies marijuana as an illegal substance. Some supporters are encouraged, though, by the Obama Administration’s announcement that they will not prosecute those involved in the medical marijuana trade.

Lee, the organizer, says he intends to spend $20 million on a campaign to win passage of the measure.

Numerous states have already decriminalized personal possession of small amounts of marijuana, though none have legalized it.

certified dealer education

California marijuana

legalization debate at Capitol

//

// 0){
document.getElementById(‘articleViewerGroup’).style.width = requestedWidth + “px”;
document.getElementById(‘articleViewerGroup’).style.margin = “0px 0px 10px 10px”;
}
// ]]>SACRAMENTO — Marijuana legalization advocates and law enforcement officials duked it out in a three-hour legislative hearing Wednesday on whether making the drug legal under state law would be good public policy.

Advocates said legalization and regulation could bring as much as $1.4 billion in state and local excise and sales tax revenue per year; control the drug’s potency; do more to keep it out of children’s hands; and end a centurylong double standard in which alcohol and tobacco — which they say are more harmful — are legal while marijuana isn’t, leading to a war on drugs particularly destructive to people of color.

Law enforcement officials testified the harms caused by marijuana legalization would far outweigh whatever tax revenue it might bring — more, not less, use by children; more people driving under the influence, causing more injuries and deaths; decreased worker productivity that could hurt the economy; and a still-thriving black market.

The hearing was convened by Assembly Public Safety Committee Chairman Tom Ammiano, D-San Francisco, who earlier this year introduced a bill to legalize and tax marijuana under a system not unlike that used for alcohol. Even as several proposed ballot measures for legalization seek to qualify for next year’s ballot, Ammiano is rewriting his bill to bring it forward again in January, and Wednesday’s hearing was supposed to help him gather input for that revamp. First up Wednesday were the Legislative Analyst’s Office, which said state and local law enforcement could save “several tens of millions of dollars each year” by no longer pursuing marijuana cases, and the Board of Equalization, which has estimated $1.4 billion in annual revenue from taxes on legalized marijuana.

Then came the lawyers. Drug Policy Alliance staff attorney Tamar Todd and American Civil Liberties Union lawyer Allen Hopper testified California is free to criminalize or not criminalize whatever it wants, and can and should chart its own course as a laboratory for new social and economic policy.

But Martin Mayer, general counsel to the California Peace Officers’ Association and the California Police Chiefs Association, underscored there would be no protection from federal law enforcement agencies arresting, charging and prosecuting Californians for violating the federal marijuana ban.

California Peace Officers’ Association President John Standish said there’s “no way marijuana legalization could protect or promote society — in fact, it radically diminishes it” by impairing educational ability, worker productivity, traffic safety and drug-related crime rates.

Ammiano asked whether police resources now used to fight marijuana would be better spent fighting harder, more harmful drugs such as methamphetamine.

“That’s like, ‘When did you stop beating your wife?’”‰” Standish replied, calling marijuana and methamphetamine “both equally critical problems our society needs to address.”

Sara Simpson, acting assistant chief of the state Justice Department’s Bureau of Narcotics Enforcement, said much of California’s major marijuana cultivation is run by Mexican drug cartels on remote public lands, and she recited a litany of violent and deadly clashes with armed guards at such sites. Such growing operations also are environmentally devastating, she said, and produce marijuana far more potent than that used just years ago. There’s no reason to believe the cartels would adhere to state laws on cultivation, potency and taxation any more than they adhere to prohibition now, she said.

Rosalie Pacula, co-director of the Drug Policy Research Center at renowned think-tank RAND Corp., said prohibition has kept marijuana prices high, and legalization with heavy taxation that elevates marijuana’s price far above the cost of its production will lead to a thriving black market.

But Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice Executive Director Dan Macallair said arrest statistics from the past 20 years show California law enforcement is far more focused on prosecuting simple possession and use than cultivation and sales. Various counties are more or less tolerant of marijuana use, he said, a lack of consistency and continuity that could be solved by regulation.

And retired Orange County Superior Court Judge Jim Gray said the state can allow and regulate marijuana without condoning its use just like alcohol and tobacco, but any legalization legislation must ban advertising lest marijuana use become glamorized.

green flags rules will bring green flag compliance

 

Now that the Obama administration says it won’t arrest medical marijuana patients and suppliers who are following their own state laws, a Northern California congressman wants the same leeway for those who are already being prosecuted.

Currently, someone who’s charged in federal court with growing or selling marijuana can’t argue that he or she was just doing what’s allowed by the law of California or one of the 13 other states that recognize the medical use of cannabis. A bill introduced Tuesday by Rep. Sam Farr, D-Monterey, would change that.

Farr’s H.R. 3939 wouldn’t legalize medical marijuana under federal law. But it would require a not-guilty verdict if the defendant was complying with state law, even if a future presidential administration repealed the guidelines announced by Attorney General Eric Holder earlier this month.

“This bipartisan bill is about compassion and states’ rights,” said Farr.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Huntington Beach, a co-sponsor, said, “The federal government should never have overridden state law on this issue to begin with, and this legislation will prevent them from doing it again.”

It’s yet another attempt to get Congress to soften the federal law that prohibits all possession, cultivation and transfer of marijuana and has been used by successive administrations to go after medical pot suppliers in California.

A group of Democrats and libertarian Republicans has been trying for years to get the feds to lay off marijuana dispensaries and growers in states where they operate legally. They’ve been beaten back by law enforcement interests and presidential drug czars who argue that medical pot is a myth and a smokescreen for legalization.

Whether the Obama administration follows the same course remains to be seen.

In Sacramento, meanwhile, Assemblyman Tom Ammiano’s bill to legalize marijuana for personal use in California in being heard this morning before the Assembly Public Safety Committee. If the San Francisco Democrat’s AB390 becomes law, or voters approve any of the circulating legalization initiatives next November, get ready for another state-federal drug war.

Bob Egelko covers legal issues for The Chronicle. E-mail him at begelko@sfchronicle.com.

Posted By: Michael Collier (Email) | October 28 2009 at 11:33 AM

compliance brings privilege

Click here

to become

the official

marijuana dealer

for the

United States government

August 18, 8:31 AMCannabis Revolution ExaminerDev Meyers

The federal government “is soliciting organizations that can grow marijuana on a large scale, with the capability to prepare marijuana cigarettes and related products, distribute marijuana, marijuana cigarettes and cannabinoids, and other related products not only for research, but also for other government programs.” – reports Rachel Ehrenfeld of Forbes.com.

If you are interested in becoming the official marijuana dealer for the United States Government click here.

Does ObamaCare mean Pot Cigarettes for all of us?

Medical Marijuana Bibliography

My grandson the doctor….. is majoring in medical cannabis management – and he’s handsome too!

compliance brings privilege

A US newspaper says it has received well over 100 applicants for the post of marijuana critic – many of whom have offered to work for free.

The alternative Denver newspaper, Westword, is seeking a writer for its weekly review of Colorado’s booming medical marijuana dispensaries.

But there is a catch – candidates must have a medical ailment allowing them to enter a dispensary and use marijuana.

Fourteen US states now allow the sale of some sort of medical cannabis.

‘Stoned’

Compensation will be meagre – and no, we can’t expense your purchases Westword job posting

“Keep in mind this isn’t about assessing the quality of the medicine on site; it’s about evaluating the quality of the establishment,” says the Westword job posting.

“After all, we can’t have our reviewer be stoned all the time.”

States like Colorado and California, where medical use is legal, have seen an explosion in the number of pot shops – ranging from upmarket clinics to dingy drugs dens.

The dispensaries sell more than a dozen varieties, from White Widow to the less expensive Afghan Gold Seal. Some cost up to $360 (£219) an ounce.

But the writer of Westword’s Mile Highs and Lows column is expected to focus on the dispensaries, not the drugs.

“Compensation will be meagre,” says the posting. It says the paper can’t pay for marijuana purchases, “although that would be pretty cool.”

compliance brings privilege

kamala

make this the green flag rules for california

as the next attorney general

jerry

support these green flag rules

in your unofficial run for govenor

++++++++++++++++++++++++

amend the 2010 california attorney general

compassionate care guidelines to read:

make all compassionate care participants take

green flag rules compliance education training annually

like this dmv list of  schools for car dealer pre-licensing

make all caregivers hold a green flag rules license

like this dmv licensed salesperson required in the car sales industry

make all green flag caregivers post a bond

like this bond requirement for licensed car dealers

make all green flag caregivers submit fingerprints

like this fingerprint requirement for dmv licensed salespersons

make all green flag caregivers obtain local zoning approval

like this property use verification form from the dmv

green flag rules will generate green flag compliance

plus a whole network of folks

to monitor and teach green flag compliance

as a matter of fact

why not just add it to the dmv with special green flag funding

from obama and holder

a model green flag rules compliance program

for the nation to follow

you might need a willis to see which way this wind will blow

gina

green flag compliance = certified dealer

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo.--(Business Wire)--
Cannabis Science Inc. (OTCBB: CBIS) an emerging pharmaceutical cannabis company
is very pleased to announce that has added four prominent attorneys, who
specialized in marijuana-related cases, to its Policy Advisory Board, as medical

marijuana legalization moves closer with President Obama`s New Medical Marijuana
Policies and initiatives.

Cannabis Science Inc., President & CEO, Dr. Robert Melamede Ph.D., stated, "We
will continue to add teams of industry experts to our Company. We are honored

that our Policy Advisory Board is expanding with some of the nation`s top
medical marijuana attorneys. Obviously, we are operating in an area where the
laws are evolving very rapidly, and we are pleased to have so many experienced

attorneys on board, helping steer the company through these complex and evolving
opportunities for us. More professionals will be added who are expert in other
relevant fields, such as FDA procedures and state and federal laws. These new

outstanding additions to the CBIS team will provide the Company with an expanded
base of knowledge to build on. As noted yesterday, the new policy means that
state compliant intrastate research in Colorado, California and other states

with medical marijuana laws are now protected from federal prosecution."

The four new additions to the Cannabis Science Policy Advisory Board

Robert Raich

Robert A. Raich practices law in Oakland, California, and is a graduate of

Harvard University and the University of Texas School of Law. He is one of the
most respected attorneys in the area of medical marijuana. He is General Counsel
of the Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, and was one of the attorneys in the

U.S. Supreme Court case, United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Coop. and
another federal medical cannabis case. He is a member of the California Attorney
General's Medical Marijuana Task Force (Chairman, Caregiver Issues

Subcommittee).

Sean T. McAllister

Sean T. McAllister is a public interest attorney with offices in Denver and
Summit County. Sean has been involved with drug policy reform efforts for over a
decade. He serves as the Chair of the Board of Directors of Sensible Colorado.

Sean is a lifetime member of the NORML Legal Committee. He is a member and Board
member of the Colorado Criminal Defense Bar. He helped start the Colorado Bar
Association Criminal Sentencing Project in 2005 to focus on criminal justice and

drug policy reform. Recently, Sean was appointed to the Governor`s Drug Policy
Task Force, which is working on reducing drug-sentencing laws to save the state
money while maintaining public safety. Along with Brian Vicente, Sean recently

founded the Canna-Business Institute designed to educate dispensary owners and
caregivers on how to legally operate medical marijuana businesses in Colorado.

Warren Edson

Warren Edson is an experienced criminal defense lawyer in Colorado, having taken

part in over 1,000 trials. He is also one of the organizers of Colorado's
Medical Marijuana Law, Amendment 20, and is a Lifetime Member, NORML Legal
Committee, and is a member, Colorado Criminal Defense Bar, and the National

Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and is a Board Member, Colorado NORML.

Robert J. Corry, Jr.

Robert J. Corry, Jr. is a Denver-based civil rights and criminal defense
attorney, specializing in medical marijuana, who has successfully litigated

several high profile cases around the country. He is admitted to the bars of
Colorado, California, and Washington, D.C., federal courts in these
jurisdictions, as well as the U.S. Supreme Court. Mr. Corry earned his law

degree from Stanford University.

About Cannabis Science, Inc.

Cannabis Science, Inc. is at the forefront of medical marijuana research and
development. The Company works with world authorities on phytocannabinoid

science targeting critical illnesses, and adheres to scientific methodologies to
develop, produce, and commercialize phytocannabinoid-based pharmaceutical
products. In sum, we are dedicated to the creation of cannabis-based medicines,

both with and without psychoactive properties, to treat disease and the symptoms
of disease, as well as for general health maintenance.

This Press Release includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of

Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Act
of 1934. A statement containing works such as "anticipate," "seek," intend,"
"believe," "plan," "estimate," "expect," "project," "plan," or similar phrases

may be deemed "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Some or all of the events or results
anticipated by these forward-looking statements may not occur. Factors that

could cause or contribute to such differences include the future U.S. and global
economies, the impact of competition, and the Company's reliance on existing
regulations regarding the use and development of cannabis-based drugs. Cannabis

Science, Inc. does not undertake any duty nor does it intend to update the
results of these forward-looking statements.

Cannabis Science Inc.
Dr. Robert J. Melamede, President & CEO, 1-888-889-0888
info@cannabisscience.com

www.cannabisscience.com
or
Peter Glaser, Investor Relations, 1-954-687-3717
info@cannabisscience.com
www.cannabisscience.com

certified dealer education

Why Is L.A.’s District Attorney

Aiding and Abetting

Mexican Drug Cartels?

By Bruce Mirken, Daily News
http://www.alternet.org/story/143310/

Last week, Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley announced a sweeping new plan to boost the profits of Mexican drug cartels, a plan almost certain to increase the slaughter these vicious gangs are perpetrating on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border.

Of course, Cooley didn’t call it that. He claimed, on dubious legal grounds, that all medical marijuana dispensaries in the county are illegal and announced plans to crack down on them. While no one denies that L.A.’s attempts – or, more accurately, nonattempts – to regulate these operations have been a mess, Cooley’s crackdown is guaranteed to make a bad situation worse.

While state law is not as precise as it might be in setting legal parameters for dispensing medical marijuana, guidelines issued last year by state Attorney General Jerry Brown make clear that dispensing collectives are legal and can include storefront operations.

“It is the opinion of this Office that a properly organized and operated collective or cooperative that dispenses medical marijuana through a storefront may be lawful under California law,” the guidelines state, so long as other requirements are met.

It may well be that some are operating outside these guidelines, but until and unless Cooley closely inspects their operations, he is simply making things up. That’s not how law enforcement should operate.

But even if Cooley were right on legal grounds, as policy his stand borders on the insane.

California law unmistakably gives patients the right to use and possess marijuana for medical purposes when recommended by their physician. And a flood of medical research over the last several years – much of it conducted by the University of California – has confirmed that marijuana can indeed provide safe, effective relief for a number of conditions, including certain hard-to-treat types of excruciating nerve pain.

So the question facing local leaders is not whether patients can have medical marijuana, but how they will obtain it. Will it be from licensed businesses operating under appropriate rules and regulations, or from drug dealers on the streets? Does Cooley really believe it’s better for either patients or communities to have the state’s medical marijuana patients – who number more than 200,000 by most estimates – getting their medicine from street dealers?

Sending patients to the streets for their medicine is clearly dangerous, subjecting sick people to risky transactions in order to purchase medicine of unknown quality, purity and origin. But it’s the question of origin that should alarm all of us.

We know that a significant amount of street marijuana can be traced to the murderous Mexican cartels – vicious gangs who make around two-thirds of their profits from the illicit marijuana trade, according to U.S. and Mexican officials. We know that these gangs are operating in at least 230 U.S. cities, including Los Angeles, Hacienda Heights and Garden Grove.

A mass shutdown of medical marijuana dispensaries will simply hand these thugs a massive new pool of customers and millions of dollars in extra profits. There is a better way.

The experience of other cities, including Oakland and San Francisco, has shown that well-crafted regulations can allow medical marijuana patients to access their medicine safely, from well-run organizations that follow the law and respect their neighborhoods.

In San Francisco, medical marijuana dispensaries have simply ceased being controversial, as explained last year by C.W. Nevius, arguably the San Francisco Chronicle’s most conservative local columnist:

“Quietly, with little fanfare, San Francisco is on the way to becoming a model for medical marijuana clubs done the right way. Exploitative, profit-hungry drug clubs are being forced out and community-based, patient-friendly ones are becoming the norm. Neighbors have shut down dispensaries in school zones, and patient services have been increased.”

It’s long past time for California’s legislature to set clear, statewide standards and licensing rules for medical marijuana providers. But until then, local officials like Cooley need to use common sense and not pursue policies that will simply enrich murderous thugs.

Bruce Mirken is communications director for the Marijuana Policy Project.

green flags rules will bring green flag compliance

Congratulations!

The New Federal Guidelines

are a Victory for Patients

This morning, the U.S. Department of Justice issued new guidelines on medical marijuana. These guidelines are a big victory for medical marijuana patients. There is still much more work to be done, but this is a great step in the right direction.

The Federal guidelines are directed at U.S. Attorneys in states that have adopted medical use laws. In the words of US Attorney General Eric Holder:

“It will not be a priority to use federal resources to prosecute patients with serious illnesses or their caregivers who are complying with state laws on medical marijuana, but we will not tolerate drug traffickers who hide behind claims of compliance with state law to mask activities that are clearly illegal.”

Thank you for helping make this happen. Your emails, phone calls, and activism helped shift the debate in America!

For the first time, the US Department of Justice is formally advising prosecutors not to interfere with medical marijuana patients in medical marijuana states. This is a big deal.

We will continue to work with President Obama, the Justice Department, and the U.S. Congress to establish a comprehensive national policy, but it’s good to know that in the meantime states can implement medical marijuana laws without interference from the federal government.

It is worth remembering that during the Bush Administration, there were more than 200 federal raids in California alone. Even now, the federal government is prosecuting more than two dozen medical marijuana cases in which defendants are prevented from using medical evidence.

There is much more work to be done. But thank you for helping us get this far.

Sincerely,

Steph Sherer
Executive Director
Americans for Safe Access

P.S. As we continue our work, we could use your help. Consider making a contribution to ASA today.

certified dealer education

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/medical-marijuana-longer-federally-prosecuted-states-legal-obama/story?id=8912772

—————————–

certified dealer education

STEPHANOPOULOS: Another trigger, that’s exactly right. But before we go,
another decision I think did not get as much play as maybe it should have
this week, the Attorney General Eric Holder announcing that the federal
government would no longer prosecute marijuana cases in states that have
approved medical marijuana laws.

ERIC HOLDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL: We will not use our limited resources in the
fight against the marijuana trade against those people who are using it
consistent with state law and to fight serious illnesses, such as cancer or
other diseases.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Right now, 14 states have medical marijuana laws. A lot of
others considering it. So this is a significant announcement.

WILL: What he’s saying is we will not pre-empt state laws with federal
poweras we could. What that means is where medical marijuana laws are enforced,
doctors will advertise, as they’re doing in California, that they will give
a prescription for medical use.

Now medical use can be marijuana to cure anxiety, to cure insomnia, all the
rest. And you will have what you now have in California, where marijuana is
essentially legalized. We have legalized gambling in this country over two
generations. It used to be considered a sin and a crime. With no national
debate, and no decision moment, we just did it. We legalized prostitution as
anyone who opens a telephone book and looks under “escort” can tell
you. And we may be doing, probably in the process now of legalizing marijuana.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Good idea?

PODESTA: Well, I think that overstates the case. I think that what Eric
Holder did was to say look, we have scarce resources. We’re not going to go
after people with glaucoma or cancer or whatever on medical marijuana.
They’re still going with a vengeance really against the Mexican drug
cartels. So I think there’s — this is kind of a mixed bag. I think we
won’tsee a full legalization of marijuana until somebody figures out that if you
tax it, maybe you can pay for health care.

STEPHANOPOULOS: That might be what drives it.

WILL: Eighty percent of the revenue of the Mexican cartels is marijuana. If
you really want to go after the Mexican cartels and I’m not saying that is
the only criterion for public policy, you’d legalize marijuana.

STEPHANOPOULOS: We are seeing gradually the public more open to the idea of
legalization. It was in the 20 percent throughout the 1990s, hit 30 percent
around 2000. Now it’s well above 40.

INGRAHAM: Yes, I think all of us have either gone through cancer or family
members and it’s a terribly painful disease. I think you have a lot of
sympathy. There’s a lot of public sympathy for medical marijuana use.

I think George hit on it, though. It’s being prescribed for a whole
range of issues. Like if you have pain from Botox injection, you can get medical
marijuana. That means a lot of people in California must be toking up, OK?
No, I’m just teasing. Look, I just have one question, does this mean
brownies are going to be for sale at the CVS and Walgreens? Because that’s
always been a product that’s been missing.

STEPHANOPOULOS: In Los Angeles, I think it may be, that’s right.

HUNT: Well now that I no longer have a teenager, I have a little bit
different view, a bit more permissive. I don’t think it’s a great
utilization of scarce federal resources to be prosecuting pot. I am not sure
if it’s going to lead to what George suggests. I’m not sure that would
be a bad idea. But I was at the University of Mississippi a couple of years ago
and it’s interesting, they grow marijuana on the campus. So, times are
A-changing.

STEPHANOPOULOS: The times are changing. I was just thinking back, could you
imagine Janet Reno in 1995, announcing that I’m not going to prosecute
this,there would have been a massive uproar.

INGRAHAM: We had jobs.

WILL: There was one problem and that is we talked to the federal drug czar
which I have done, marijuana is getting much better. They’re growing and
making it better in the sense that the active ingredient is much stronger
than it used to be.

TUCKER: Well, I wished that I believed that this was going to lead to some
broader federal look at the whole futile war on drugs. But as John just
mentioned, Eric Holder followed that announcement with massive raids on drug
cartels, which isn’t a bad idea. I just don’t think that this is a
relook at the futility on the war on drugs. I really think instead of just acting in a
small way to say, marijuana isn’t such a bad thing. Let’s relook at
all ofour drug laws, the way we fight the so-called war on drugs, because it
isn’t working.

STEPHANOPOULOS: I think John may be right. What’s going to drive that in
the long run are budget issues. That’s all we have time for today. You guys
continue this in the green room. You all can catch it on ABCNews.com and get
political updates all week long from our daily newsletter which is also on
ABCNews.com.

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000003230573

********************

Sincerely,

Degé Coutee
Education & Advocacy Director
Patient Advocacy Network

www.CannabisSavesLives.com